United States v. Sanchez’s Empirical Analysis
449 F.2d 204 · 1971
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Glasser v. United States · Federal Trade Commission v. Textile & Apparel Group · United States v. Montos · Odom v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Voluntary statements of any kind, not in response to custodial interrogation, are not barred by the Fifth Amendment, nor has their admissibility been affected, by the Miranda decision or its progeny. In several cases voluntary self-incriminating statements made by persons under arrest have been ruled admissible, notwithstanding the fact that Miranda warnings had not been given at the time the statements were made. See United States v. Welsh, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 361 ; United States v. Bourassa, 10 Cir., 1969, 411 F.2d 69 , cert. denied 396 U.S. 915 , 90 S.Ct. 235 , 24 L.Ed.2d 192 (1969); United States v. Godfrey, 10 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 1338 ; Anderson v. United States, 10 Cir., 1968, 399 F.2d 753 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.