Joseph L. Lara v. Louis S. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
449 F.2d 323 · 1971
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on William Ellhamer, and v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Charles Hinnington, and v. Department of Corrections, Etc. · Lewis Lawrence Allen v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden · Gagliasso v. Rood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In a habeas corpus proceeding before a circuit or district judge, the final order shall be subject to review, on appeal, by the court of appeals for the circuit where the proceeding is had. “There shall be no right of appeal from such an order in a proceeding to test the validity of a warrant to remove, to another district or place for commitment or trial, a person charged with a criminal offense against the United States, or to test the validity of his detention pending removal proceedings. “An appeal may not be taken to the court of appeals from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding where the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a State court, unless the justice or judge who rendered the order or a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of probable cause.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gardner v. Pogue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.