Dillen v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis
449 F.2d 331 · 1971
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Romano v. United States · International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers v. Hardeman · Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Southern Railway Co. · United States v. Bearden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In federal prosecutions, the bill of particulars does not have the function of providing detailed disclosure of the government’s evidence in advance of trial. All that is necessary is that the defendant be advised of any essential detail which may have been omitted from the indictment.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.