United States v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
449 F.2d 925 · 1971
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1998 · most notably Muniz v. Hoffman (1975), United States v. Alter (1973)
23 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · United States v. United Mine Workers of America · In re Oliver · Bloom v. Illinois · Cooke v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . . [t]he notice shall state the time and place of hearing, allowing a reasonable time for the preparation of the defense, and shall state the essential facts constituting the criminal contempt charged and describe it as such, (emphasis added)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“contain(ing) enough to inform (the alleged contemnor) of the nature and particulars of the contempt charged.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonable time for the preparation of the defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.