Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 449 F.3d 167 - United States v. Baugham

United States v. Baugham’s Empirical Analysis

449 F.3d 167 · 2006

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably United States v. Wilson (2010), United States v. Law (2008)

26 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

240200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from District of Columbia District Court)

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2111

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Booker · Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Olano · Blockburger v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`In exceptional circumstances, especially in criminal cases, appellate courts, in the public interest, may, of their own motion, notice errors to which no exception has been taken, if the errors are obvious, or if they otherwise seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]his court in any event has the power to notice a plain error sua sponte”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.