Martinez v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Relies on William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. ITT Continental Baking Co. · Hodges v. Callaway · Norton v. Macy · 13 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1436, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,206 Manuel Aguirre v. Chula Vista Sanitary Service and Sani-Tainer, Inc. · Schwartz v. Covington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as applied, the regulations require the mandatory discharge of those found to be homosexuals or to have engaged in homosexual conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Beller v. Middendorf“may be separated by reason of misconduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Beller v. Middendorf
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.