Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 449 MASS 476 - Commonwealth v. Washington

Commonwealth v. Washington’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
3
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

2 district · 70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Commonwealth v. Tyree (2010), Commonwealth v. Gomes (2009)

2 district · 70 state decisions

620200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chimel v. California · New York v. Belton · Rawlings v. Kentucky · United States v. Lovasco · Brigham City v. Stuart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a motion to suppress, we accept the judge's subsidiary findings of fact absent clear error, but conduct an independent review of the judge's ultimate findings and conclusions of law.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hile drug involvement certainly may be a relevant factor in assessment of threats to police safety, we are reluctant to adopt a blanket rule that all persons suspected of drug activity are to be presumed armed and dangerous for constitutional purposes.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “To permit a search incident to arrest where the suspect is not arrested until much later, or is never arrested, would sever this exception completely from its justifications.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.