Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 449 Mich. 263 - People v. Konrad

People v. Konrad’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Even in a case relying on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution need not negate every reasonable theory consistent with the defendant's innocence, but need merely introduce evidence sufficient to convince a reasonable jury in the face of whatever contradictory evidence the defendant may provide.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a defendant's confession may not be admitted unless there is direct or circumstantial evidence independent of the confession establishing (1) the occurrence of the specific injury . . . and (2) some criminal agency as the source of the injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.