Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 449 N.E.2d 1083 - Quire v. State

Quire v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2003
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2003

6 state decisions

40198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Elmore v. State · Sansom v. State · Adams v. State · Estep v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"To obtain a conviction for burglary, it is not necessary for the state to prove that the defendant committed theft or any other felony since the burglary is complete upon breaking and entering with mere intent to commit a felony. Similarly, a conviction for theft may obtain with out proof of a breaking and entering. Thus, the two offenses are not the same and separate sentences may be imposed for each."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.