Anacomp, Inc. v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2013
3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 125 Ind. App. 302 - Groves v. Burton · 162 Ind. App. 436 - Faught v. State · 16 Wash. App. 81 - ROGERS WALLA WALLA v. Ballard · Geier v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co. · Raper v. UNION FEDERAL SAV. & L. ASS'N OF EVANSVILLE
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Stipulations have been defined as agreements between counsel respecting business before the court. Courts generally favor stipulations which admit certain designated facts for the purpose of simplifying and expediting litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An action for an accounting is equitable in nature with the purpose of adjusting the account of the litigants and of rendering complete justice in a single action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.