Dwyer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
3 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2001
3 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 5003
Relies on Scalza v. United States · Drews v. Maryland · Anderson v. Alabama · Martin v. Davis · Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The commissioner shall determine the availability of state prison facilities suitable for, the detention and confinement of persons held under authority of state law. If the commissioner determines that suitable state prison facilities are not available, the commissioner may enter into an agreement with a public agency to provide necessary facilities. Correctional facilities provided through agreement may be in this state or in another state. The commissioner may not enter into an agreement with an agency un able to provide a degree of custody, care, and discipline similar to that required by the laws of this state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hertz v. State“An authority, receiving physical custody for the purpose of incarceration of a person sentenced by a court under the terms of an agreement made under this section, shall be considered as acting solely as agent of this state. This state retains jurisdiction over a person incarcerated in an institution of another state, the United States, or a political subdivision of this state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hertz v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.