Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 449 P2D 700 - Birch v. Keen

Birch v. Keen’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 1995
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1995

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

401969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Cauthen · Davis v. Higgins · St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Chester · Pickering Lumber Co. v. Campbell · Midland Valley R. Co. v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A mutual mistake of fact should justify the recission of a release executed under the belief that injuries are trivial and temporary, when as a matter of fact they are serious and permanent in their nature, where it appears that the purpose of the release was to compensate for apparent injuries, known injuries, and that serious or permanent injuries were not contemplated by the parties at the time of the execution of the agreement or release, although in its terms the agreement or release is broad enough to cover all injuries, resulting from the particular incident.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A release may be set aside for mutual mistake; but in such case there must be mutual mistake of a past or present fact material to the agreement, and must not be a mistake in prophecy, opinion, or in belief relative to an uncertain event such as probable developments from and permanency of a known injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.