449 So. 2d 141 - State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2008
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Shapiro · 400 So. 2d 1370 - State v. Edwards · 418 So. 2d 547 - State v. Savoy · State v. Sumler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“General criminal intent is present whenever there is specific intent, and also when the circumstances indicate that the offender, in the ordinary course of human experience, must have adverted to the prescribed criminal consequences as reasonably certain to result from his act or failure to act.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A. Cruelty to juveniles is the intentional or criminally negligent mistreatment or neglect, by anyone over the age of seventeen, of any child under the age of seventeen whereby unjustifiable pain or suffering is caused to said child. Lack of knowledge of the child's age shall not be a defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“1. That the defendant was over the age of seventeen; 2. That the victim was under the age of seventeen; 3. That the victim was caused unjustifiable pain or suffering; and 4. That the defendant intentionally mistreated or neglected the victim, or 5. That the defendant was criminally negligent in her mistreatment or neglect of the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Berkley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.