In re Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. State · Michigan Wis. Pipe Line Co. v. Sugarland Develop. Corp. · Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Bonin · Pearce v. Gunter · Crescent Welding Supply Co. v. Harding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(d) The above article covers judgments rendered in cases where there was no citation at all, cases involving defective citation, and cases where the defendant did not effect a waiver of service and citation by making a general appearance.” In light of the cited articles we conclude that appellant’s remedy, if he be aggrieved by the judgment ... is by way of a suit for nullity of judgment and not by appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The declinatory exception must be pleaded prior to answer or judgment by default. LSA-C.C.P. Article 925 and 928. LSA-C.C.P. Article 2001 provides: “The nullity of a final judgment may be demanded for vices of either form or substance, as provided in Articles 2002 through 2006.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““A final judgment shall be annulled if it is rendered: (2) Against a defendant who has not been served with process as required by law and who has not entered a general appearance.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.