Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 449 SO2D 332 - Snowden v. State

Snowden v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. California · 426 So. 2d 963 - Faison v. State · 383 So. 2d 219 - Eutsey v. State · 401 So. 2d 1343 - State v. Rivers · Joyner v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) As used in this act: (a) "Habitual felony offender” means a defendant for whom the court may impose an extended term of imprisonment, as provided in this section, if it finds that: 1. The defendant has: a. previously been convicted of a felony in this state; b. twice previously been convicted of a misdemeanor of the first degree in this state or of another qualified offense for which the defendant was convicted after the defendant's 18th birthday; 2. The felony for which the defendant is to be sentenced was committed within five years of the date of the conviction of the last prior felony, misdemeanor or other qualified offense of which he was convicted, or within five years of the defendant’s release, on parole or otherwise, from a prison sentence or other commitment imposed as a result of a prior conviction for a felony or other qualified offense, whichever is later; ****** (3) In a separate proceeding, the court shall determine if it is necessary for the protection of the public to sentence the defendant to an extended term as provided in subsection (4) and if the defendant is an habitual felony offender or an habitual misdemeanant. The procedure shall be as follows: ****** (d) Each of the findings required as the basis for such sentence shall be found to exist by a preponderance of the evidence and shall be appealable to the extent normally applicable to similar findings. ****** (4)(a) The court, in conformity with the procedure established in subsection (3) and upon ”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “after having been convicted ... of a felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.