Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 449 So. 2d 344 - Johnson v. Davis

449 So. 2d 344 - Johnson v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 2012

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

1101984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 213 Cal. App. 2d 729 - Lingsch v. Savage · 76 Ill. App. 3d 638 - Posner v. Davis · 389 So. 2d 995 - Besett v. Basnett · Swinton v. Whitinsville Savings Bank · 220 Cal. App. 2d 463 - Saporta v. Barbagelata

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “F. Roof Inspection: Prior to closing at Buyer's expense, Buyer shall have the right to obtain a written report from a licensed roofer stating that the roof is in a watertight condition. In the event repairs are required either to correct leaks or to replace damage to facia or soffit, seller shall pay for said repairs which shall be performed by a licensed roofing contractor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Three roofers hired by the Davises found that the roof was inherently defective, that any repairs would be temporary because the roof was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “we realize that this duty is equally applicable to real estate brokers[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.