Rycraft v. United Technologies’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2005
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 354 So. 2d 921 - Varig Brazil. Air. v. Fla. Dept of C., Etc. · Fort Myers Pump & Supply, Inc. v. FLA. DEPT OF LABOR & EMP. SECURITY · 411 So. 2d 313 - Sanchez v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ETC. · 433 So. 2d 24 - HILLSBOROUGH CTY. DEPT. OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES v. Unemp. Appeals Comm. · 415 So. 2d 155 - Co-Tran, Fla. Transit Management, Inc. v. Goodman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Misconduct" includes, but is not limited to, the following, which shall not be construed in pari materia with each other: (a) Conduct evincing such willful or wanton disregard of an employer's interests as is found in deliberate violation or disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his or her employee; or (b) Carelessness or negligence of such a degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design or to show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer's interests or of the employee's duties and obligations to his or her employer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.