¶1The adjudication of delinquency below is supported by one of the respondent’s confessions in evidence which — unlike Harper v. State, 411 So.2d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), upon which she relies — is thoroughly inconsistent with both her exculpatory testimony at trial and her other extra judicial statements. State v. Frazier, 407 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
¶2Affirmed.