McCandless v. MM PARRISH CONST.’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on American States Insurance v. Piasecki · 412 So. 2d 461 - Swartz v. Swartz · 442 So. 2d 1026 - Swanigan v. Dobbs House · 411 So. 2d 919 - Flesche v. Interstate Warehouse · Redgate v. National Society for the Prevention of Blindness, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is an abuse of discretion for the deputy to reject uncontroverted medical testimony without a reasonable explanation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]here the testimony and evidence are uncontradicted, a finding contrary to the manifest weight of such testimony and evidence is not supported by competent substantial evidence. Standard Oil Company v. Gay, 118 So.2d 212 (Fla. 1960); See: Willingham v. Boynton Service Corporation, 383 So.2d 710 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 392 So.2d 1372 (Fla. 1980).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.