Mirowitz v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 1982
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sensabaugh v. State · 148 Tex. Crim. 177 - Mounts v. State · 141 Tex. Crim. 387 - Smith v. State · 92 Tex. Crim. 650 - Hughes v. State · 134 Tex. Crim. 390 - Palmer v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘When defendant takes the stand as a witness he is subject to the same rules as any other witness. He may be contradicted, impeached, discredited, attacked, sustained, bolstered up, made to give evidence against himself, cross-examined as to new matter, and treated in every respect as any other witness testifying in behalf of defendant, except where some statute forbids certain matters to be used against him, such as proof of his conviction on the former trial of the present case, his failure to testify on a former trial or hearing, and the like.’ (quoting 1 Branch’s Ann.P.C.2d, Section 168, page 170.) “ ‘In both civil and criminal cases a party may show that the reputation for truth and veracity of a material witness for the opposite party is bad. That showing may be made where a party testifies as a witness in his own behalf, * * (quoting 62 Tex.Jur.2d, Section 282, page 267.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Parr v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.