Pryor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2001
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hamilton v. Alabama · Scott v. State · 163 Tex. Crim. 202 - Wilson v. State · Klechka v. State · 136 Tex. Crim. 275 - Cain v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]s a general rule an object offered in evidence should not be rejected merely because it is not positively identified as the exact object that was connected with the crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"The court shall never restrict the argument in felony cases to a number of addresses less than two on each side."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Varela v. State · Palasota v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.