Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 449 U.S. 117 - United States v. DiFrancesco

United States v. DiFrancesco’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

3,180
cited by 3,180 later decisions
60
cited 60 times by the Supreme Court
48
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

946 federal appellate · 71 district · 1,646 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3,180 later decisions (60 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2026 · most notably Monge v. California (1998), Tibbs v. Florida (1982)

946 federal appellate · 71 district · 1,646 state decisions — followed in 48 states

1.2k019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1361 · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 18 U.S.C. § 842 · 21 U.S.C. § 849 (§ 409 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Burks v. United States · Benton v. Maryland · Green v. United States · United States v. Jorn

Cited together with North Carolina v. Pearce · Burks v. United States · United States v. Scott · Green v. United States · Bozza v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3,180 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the pronouncement of sentence has never carried the finality that attaches to an acquittal.”
    228 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(n)o person shall, for the same offense, be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb ....”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “where there is no threat of either multiple punishment or successive prosecutions, the Double Jeopardy Clause is not offended.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.