Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 449 U.S. 24 - Dennis v. Sparks

Dennis v. Sparks’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

2,552
cited by 2,552 later decisions
28
cited 28 times by the Supreme Court
23
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

800 federal appellate · 321 district · 100 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,552 later decisions (28 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co. (1982), Briscoe v. W (1983)

800 federal appellate · 321 district · 100 state decisions — followed in 23 states

879019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 242 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Monroe v. Pape · Imbler v. Pachtman · United States v. Nixon · Pierson v. Ray

Cited together with Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co. · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Stump v. Sparkman · Harlow v. Fitzgerald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,552 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “willful participant in joint action with the State or its agents.”
    55 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “merely resorting to the courts and being on the winning side of a lawsuit does not make a party a co-conspirator or a joint actor with the judge.”
    35 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] Sec. 1983 defendant need not be an officer of the state. It is enough if he is a willful participant in joint activity with the state or its agents.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.