Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 AD2D 431 - People v. Francis

People v. Francis’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2004

9 state decisions

401974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matthews v. State · People v. Shakun · 7 E.H. Smith 90 - People v. . Nelson · Peoples v. State · 124 N.J. Super. 425 - State v. Valentine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he bar was not the Defendant's business. He held no proprietary interest therein. By extending the statutory exception to include a manager, the door is opened to a CT Page 994 multiplicity of situations where the term manager might be invoked to sanction possession of a weapon otherwise proscribed by [the law].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.