Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 APPDC 498 - Gray v. Ward

Gray v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 1961
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1961

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

30191619201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Langford v. Monteith · Hart v. Carnall-Hopkins Co. · Jakeway v. Barrett · Holman v. Taylor · Copertini v. Oppermann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Leaving out of view those states in which the justice may he ousted of his jurisdiction by some action of the defendant which puts the title to real estate in issue, it seems to be the fair result of the decisions that the question of jurisdiction under statutes like our own is to he determined by the declaration, and whenever it is necessary for the plaintiff, in order to make good his declaration, to go into the question of title, whether by way of proving it or disproving it, the title to land is involved, and the justice has no jurisdiction. When this test is applied to the present case, it is evident that the title to land was necessarily involved. As the court below instructed the jury, it was impossible for the plaintiff to recover if he did receive a good title by way of the deed in question.” [ 45 App.D.C. at 505 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.