Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 BTA 104 - Hague v. Commissioner

Hague v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably DiLeo v. Commissioner (1991), Estate of Mason v. Commissioner (1975)

3 federal appellate ·

18019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Helvering v. Taylor · Mauch v. Commissioner · Willits v. Commissioner · Calafato v. Commissioner · Holmstrom v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The accumulation of wealth during the taxable year, like the possession and use of unexplained cash, is merely evidential, and, where a taxpayer fails to keep proper books of account and is unable to explain the source of accumulated property, such accumulations may be the basis for the determination of income, but the failure to accumulate wealth during the taxable year does not negative the realization or receipt of income, particularly where it is shown as in this case that a taxpayer has expended large sums of money during the taxable year for personal uses and there is a failure on his part to show that the amounts so expended were of a character other than income earned or realized during the year.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “By design the statute contemplates the keeping by a taxpayer of accounts and records from which his correct income can be determined, and in the absence of such books of account the respondent must determine or verify his income from the records or sources that are available.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.