Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

45 Cal. 303

Kelly v. Mack

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873

California Supreme Court · decided 1873-07-01

<p>Recovery of Purchase Money for Land Sold.—Where the seller contracts that upon the payment of the purchase money he will execute and deliver to the buyer a deed for the land sold, he cannot maintain an action for the purchase money without first tendering a deed and demanding payment.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1958

1 state decisions

Relies on Hill v. Grigsby

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1873-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court:

¶1This is an action to recover the purchase money for a tract of land sold by the plaintiff to the defendant, and to enforce *304a vendor’s lien. One of the terms of the contract of sale was, that upon the payment of the purchase money the plaintiff would execute and deliver to the defendant a deed of conveyance of his (the plaintiff’s) right, title, and interest in the land. The complaint contains no allegation of the tender of a deed of conveyance, and on this ground, among others, the defendant demurred to the complaint. The demurrer should have been sustained on this ground. That is the well established doctrine of this Court. (Hill v. Grigsby, 35 Cal. 661; Bohall v. Diller, 41 id. 532.)

¶2Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to sustain the demurrer to the complaint.

/45/cal/303 · .json · Public domain