45 Cal. 654
Decided July 1, 1873
California Supreme Court · decided 1873-07-01
The defendant had judgment in an action to abate a nuisance, and the plaintiff appealed. The facts are stated in the opinion.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1873-07-01
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1903
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The appéal is taken only from the order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. It nowhere appears that a notice of intention to move for a new trial was given, by the appellant or waived by the respondent by appearance to the *655motion, or in any other manner, and it is objected, and we think well objected, by the respondent, that in the absence of such a notice or waiver, the order denying a new trial cannot be reviewed here.
¶2Order affirmed.