Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 Cal. 2d 171 - In Re Hess

45 Cal. 2d 171 - In Re Hess’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

295
cited by 295 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 281 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 295 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2023 · most notably Green v. United States (1957), 3 Cal. 3d 595 - People v. West (1970)

4 federal appellate · 281 state decisions

75019551960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Oliver · Cooke v. United States · 35 Cal. 2d 175 - People v. Knowles · 30 Cal. 2d 589 - People v. Greer · 19 Cal. 2d 488 - In Re Bell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 295 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Due process of law requires that an accused be advised of the charges against him in order that he may have a reasonable opportunity to prepare and present his defense and not be taken by surprise by evidence offered at his trial.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A person cannot be convicted of an offense (other than a necessarily included offense) not charged against him by indictment or information, whether or not there was evidence at his trial to show that he had committed that offense.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““When the defendant is convicted or acquitted, or has once been placed in jeopardy upon an indictment, the conviction, acquittal or jeopardy is a bar to another indictment for the offense charged in the former, or for an attempt to commit the same, or for an offense included therein, of which he might have been convicted under that indictment.” I.C. § 19-1719. “The jury may find the defendant guilty of any offense, the commission of which is necessarily included in that with which he is charged in the indictment, or of an attempt to commit the offense.” I.C. § 19-2312.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.