Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 Cal. 3d 604 - People v. Silva

45 Cal. 3d 604 - People v. Silva’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

185
cited by 185 later decisions
4
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 167 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 185 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably 10 Cal. 4th 764 - People v. Stanley (1995), 8 Cal. 4th 137 - People v. Turner (1994)

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 167 state decisions

63019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Faretta v. California · Rakas v. Illinois · Ohio v. Roberts · Bourjaily v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 185 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “committed during the commission, or attempted commission of the crime to which he or she was a witness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[A] typical example of an adoptive admission is the accusatory statement to a criminal defendant made by a person other than a police officer, and defendant's conduct of silence, or his words or equivocal and evasive replies in response. With knowledge of the accusation, the defendant's conduct of silence or his words in the nature of evasive or equivocal replies lead reasonably to the inference that he believes the accusatory statement to be true.' [Citation.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Moreover, it is well settled that an adoptive admission can be admitted into evidence without violating the Sixth Amendment right to confrontation `on the ground that "once the defendant has expressly or impliedly adopted the statements of another, the statements become his own admissions, and are admissible on that basis as a well-recognized exception to the hearsay rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.