Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 Cal. App. 302 - Roper v. Smith

45 Cal. App. 302 - Roper v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
April 1963
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 1963

10 state decisions

60191919201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Biddel v. Brizzolara · State Loan & Trust Co. v. Cochran · Wood v. . Seely · Smith v. Lawrence · Krathwohl v. Dawson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘It is a general rule that an estoppel operates, not only on the parties to the transaction but also on their privies in blood, estate, and contract’.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.