45 Cal. App. 623 - Karst v. Seller’s Empirical Analysis
1920
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 1967 · most notably 46 Cal. App. 198 - Fitzhugh v. University of Realty Co. (1920), 50 Cal. App. 2d 503 - Rilcoff v. Superior Court (1942)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. . Zalinski · Dayton v. Donart · McDonald v. California Timber Co. · Reilly v. Russell · Fitterling v. Welch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The action of the court on the questions involved in the order for change of place of trial has all the characteristics of a final judgment. Issues of fact are presented and tried on their merits, and an appeal lies from the order. We find no California decisions on this point, but the general rule in other jurisdictions seems to be that if a motion involves a substantial right, and a full hearing is afforded thereon, and the order made on such motion is appealable, such order is a final adjudication of all matters involved in the motion. (Ann. Cas. 1914D, 975, note; Hoge v. Norton, 22 Kan. 265 ; Truesdale v. Farmers’ Loan etc. Co., 67 Minn. 454 [ 64 Am. St. Rep. 430 , 70 N. W. 568 ]; Bennett’s Admr. v. Russell’s Extrx., 39 Mo. 152 [ 90 Am. Dec. 457 ]; Fitterling v. Welch, 76 Minn. 441 [ 79 N. W. 500 ]; Rogers v. McCord-Collins Co., 19 Okl. 115 [ 91 Pac. 864 ]; Smith v. Zalinski, 94 N. Y. 524 .) ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.