Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 CALAPP2D 541 - Dallapi v. Campbell

Dallapi v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
7
states following
August 1980
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 1980 · most notably Wong v. Di Grazia (1963), 160 Cal. App. 2d 332 - McQuarrie v. Kuttler (1958)

3 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

13019411950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCray v. Citizens Trust & Savings Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule against perpetuities was violated at the time of the execution of the deed to plaintiffs, because of the possibility that the future interest (oil and gas lease), might vest beyond the required period, as conformity to the rule does not permit speculation as to the vesting of such future interest within the period of lives of persons in being, plus twenty-one years. The mere possibility of the property interest vesting beyond the period, constitutes the violation of the rule. ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘Under the usual oil and gas lease, the owner-lessor transfers to his lessee his right to drill for and produce oil and other substances. The right of the lessee presents a clear case of a profit a prendre in gross, a right to remove a part of the substance of the land. * * * This profit a pendre vests in the lessee an incorporeal hereditament, a present estate, an interest in the land, which is a chattel real if it is to endure for years’ ”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We do conclude, however, in view of the fact that the execution of an oil and gas lease constitutes the conveyance of an estate in real property, that the reservation of a power or a right to lease plaintiffs' property, unlimited as to the time of execution of such lease, was a violation of the rule against perpetuities, and therefore void and of no effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.