Park v. Park’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2007
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Farmers' High Line Canal & Reservoir Co. v. Southworth · Thomas v. Guiraud · Schilling v. Rominger · Nichols v. McIntosh · Fuller v. Swan River Placer Min. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Oral agreements concerning priorities and title to water rights followed by its change of possession and application by the claimant have hitherto been held valid by this court, also that part performance will take it out of the statute of frauds and equity will enforce the right thus acquired. Schilling et al. v. Rominger, 4 Colo. 104; McLure v Koen, 25 Colo. 284 , 53 Pac. 1058 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ullman v. Kelley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.