Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 COLO 401 - Sternberger v. Seaton Mining Co.

Sternberger v. Seaton Mining Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
February 1988
most recently cited

1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 1988

1 district · 5 state decisions

30190919101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State of Kansas v. State of Colorado · United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co. · Clark v. Nash · Lux v. Haggin · Basey v. Gallagher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Supreme Court of the United States, in several cases, has approved and indicated its satisfaction with the decisions of the state courts which hold that the common law doctrine has been abolished, and has said that each state, without interference by the federal courts, may for itself, and as between rival individual claimants, determine which doctrine shall be therein enforced.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The doctrine in this state that the common law rule of continuous flow of natural streams is abolished, is so firmly established by our constitution, the statutes of the territory and the state, and by many decisions of this court, that we decline to reopen or reconsider it, however interesting discussion thereof might otherwise be, and notwithstanding its importance.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.