Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 CONNAPP 289 - State v. Hughes

State v. Hughes’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2025

12 state decisions

401997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Doyle v. Ohio · Dennis v. Dennis · Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen · In re Disbarment of Sacco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “With respect to post-Miranda warning . . . silence does not mean only muteness; it includes the statement of a desire to remain silent, as well as of a desire to remain silent until an attorney has been consulted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “no less than eight different times as to the defendant's request not to talk about the accusations,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “strongly-worded argument suggesting a connection between the defendant's silence and his guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.