Howe v. Barney’s Empirical Analysis
45 F. 668 · 1891
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1988
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brinckerhoff v. . Bostwick · Dewing v. Perdicaries · Ringo v. Binns · Carter v. Ford Plate Glass Co. · Evans v. Brandon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is a well-established rule of law that a stockholder’s suit to remedy a wrong'done to the corporation must be in behalf of all the stockholders, since they are equally interested in the results' of the suit.” “ ‘An injury done to the stock and capital by negligence or defeasance is not an injury to such separate interest, but to the whole body of stockholders in common.’ ” Id. p. 2429, note 1. “Money or property recovered from directors or third persons, in a suit in equity instituted by a stockholder in behalf of all the stockholders, belongs' to all the stockholders and not- to the complaining stockholder. It goes to the corporation. The decree must be for the benefit of the corporation and not for the complainant stockholders.” Id. p. 2431.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The avails of the litigation, if there be any, go to the corporation, and are a part of its means, as if it had itself sued and recovered.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Dennett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.