Solinsky v. McPherson

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 6, 1930.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 12, 1931.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1930-12-06

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1937

2 counsel of record

Relies on Solinsky v. McPherson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1930-12-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James F. Peek and Edw. R. Solinsky, both of San Francisco, Cal., and Nutter, Hancock & Rutherford and A. P. Hayne, all of Stockton, Cal., for appellants.

¶2Clyde 'H. Brand and Downey, Brand & Seymour, all of Sacramento, Cal., for appellees.

¶3Before RUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The decree is affirmed on the authority of Solinsky v. McPherson et al. (C. C. A., No. 6113), 45 F.(2d) 778, just decided.