Michel v. Beard’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2013
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1202 · 11 U.S.C. § 1222 · 11 U.S.C. § 1225 · 11 U.S.C. § 326 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 11 U.S.C. § 507 · 28 U.S.C. § 586 (§ 224 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (Title 11))
Relies on Groves v. Ring Screw Works · Revco Ds Inc Morgenstern US v. Revco Ds Inc · Fulkrod v. Savage · Overholt v. Farm Credit Services (In Re Overholt) · Matter of Pianowski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“standing trustee's role in a family-farm reorganization ... primarily involves collecting the debtor's postpetition income and making proper payments, in accordance with the plan, to the waiting creditors”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pelofsky v. Wallace“In a case under chapter 12 or 13 of this title, the court may not allow compensation for services or reimbursement of expenses ... of a standing trustee ap pointed under section 586(b) of title 28....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re McLendon“Congress had constructed a scheme that envisioned that debtors would at times be able to pay their debts directly to their creditors, allowing them to bypass the trustee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.