Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 F.3d 1190 - Harris v. Shalala

Harris v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

45 F.3d 1190 · 1995

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
September 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2013

1 federal appellate · 7 district ·

120199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · Woolf v. Shalala · Thompson v. Bowen · Locher v. Sullivan · Ghant v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An ALJ must do more than rely on the mere invocation of Polaski to insure safe passage for his or her decision through the course of appellate review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 40 F. Supp. 2d 1108 - Rhodes v. Apfel · 648 F. Supp. 2d 1101 - Letson v. Astrue
  2. “Resort to the [Medical-Vocational] Guidelines is permissible even though there is a nonexertional impairment, provided that the ALJ finds, and the record supports the finding, that the nonexertional impairment does not significantly diminish the claimant's residual functional capacity to perform the full range of activities listed in the Guidelines.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 464 F. Supp. 2d 864 - Cassidy v. Barnhart
  3. “Further, we may not reverse a decision of the Secretary merely because substantial evidence would have supported an opposite conclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Dailey v. Chater

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.