Intercontinental Travel Marketing, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance’s Empirical Analysis
45 F.3d 1278 · 1994
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably United States of America v. Viken Hovsepian (2004), Freeman v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1995)
36 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1821 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Brock v. Pierce County · Caso v. United States · United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. · Perez v. Jones · Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, no court shall have jurisdiction over— (i) any claim or action for payment from, or any action seeking a determination of rights with respect to, the assets of any depository institution for which the Corporation has been appointed receiver, including assets which the Corporation may acquire from itself as such receiver; or (ii) any claim relating to any act or omission of such institution or the Corporation as receiver.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“awaiting expiration of the administrative deadline”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Section 1821(d)(3)(A) of FIRREA provides the FDIC, acting in its capacity as receiver, with the authority to determine claims against a failed depository institution. If a claimant submits a timely claim to the FDIC, it must determine within 180 days whether to allow or disallow the claim. If the FDIC fails to determine the claim or disallows the claim, then, under § 1821(d)(6)(A), the claimant has 60 days to request administrative review or file or continue suit on such claim in the district court. No court has jurisdiction over the claim until the exhaustion of this administrative process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.