Bemis’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably State v. McClaugherty (2003), State v. Henry (2016)
7 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Yagow v. United States · Brown v. United States · Porzig v. Nolden · Wrenn v. Ohio Department of Mental Health
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] 'prior statement by a witness' offered to show inconsistency with testimony at trial is not hearsay. However, this rule only applies to prior inconsistent statements of testifying witnesses . Whereas an inconsistent statement by a testifying witness can be used to impeach that witness's credibility, an inconsistent account by another source is offered to show an alternative view of the truth”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the subject matter of an excited utterance is frequently a description of the 'startling event,' the statement need only 'relat[e] to' the startling event.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.