Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 F.3d 316 - Mario Micomonaco v. State Of Washington

Mario Micomonaco v. State Of Washington’s Empirical Analysis

45 F.3d 316 · 1995

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
December 2024
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Hill v. Blind Industries & Services of Maryland (1999), Romano v. Bible (1999)

20 federal appellate · 4 district ·

2801995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391

Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Hans v. State of Louisiana · Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer · Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Congress can abrogate the Eleventh Amendment without the consent of the states in certain instances or a state may waive its immunity by consenting to suit in federal court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “only where stated by the most express language or by such overwhelming implication from the text as [will] leave no room for any other reasonable construction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.