Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

45 F.3d 425

Docket No. 92-6115.

Michael Anthony Bolden v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted January 10, 1994 Decided Dec. 29, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-12-29

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Beverly v. Charles Machine Works Incorporated Beverly

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-12-29

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-91-99-N)

Michael Anthony Bolden, Appellant Pro Se.

Katherine P. Baldwin, Office of the Atty. Gen., of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bolden v. Murray, No. CA-91-99-N (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/45/f3d/425 · .json · Public domain