Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 F.3d 70 - Spr Corporation Resolution Trust Corporation v. Spr Corporation

Spr Corporation Resolution Trust Corporation v. Spr Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

45 F.3d 70 · 1995

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Weiss McGahren v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Company (1997), English-Speaking Union v. Johnson (2004)

16 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

230199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Sierra Switchboard Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. · Nielsen v. Price · United States v. One Motor Yacht Named Mercury

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) make a finding of bad faith or negligence; (2) give the appellant notice or an opportunity to explain the delay; (3) consider whether the delay had any possible prejudicial effect on the other parties; or (4) indicate that it considered the impact of the sanction and available alternatives.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the danger of prejudice to the debtor, the length of the delay and its potential impact on judicial proceedings, the reason for the delay, including whether it was within the reasonable control of the movant, and whether the movant acted in good faith.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An appellant’s failure to take any step other than timely filing a notice of appeal does not affect the validity of the appeal, but is ground for such action as the district court ... deems appropriate, which may include dismissal of the appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.