Baccus v. Parrish’s Empirical Analysis
45 F.3d 958 · 1995
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2022
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Relies on Powell v. McCormack · Southern Pacific Terminal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Marco Defunis et al. v. Charles Odegaard, President of the University of Washington. · Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp. · City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“seeks to attack or undermine an order of a federal district court.” Id. at 960 . The court reasoned that, although the cause of action was brought under the laws of Texas,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Events both before and after the filing of a claim may render a claimant's case moot. Mootness doctrine requires that the controversy posed by a complaint be present throughout the litigation process,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“courts will typically look beyond the face of a complaint to determine whether removal is proper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.