Belya v. Kapral’s Empirical Analysis
2022
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2072
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · Johnson v. Jones · Abney v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not pass judgment on the internal policies and or determinations of [ROCOR],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Belya v. Kapral“exclusively on objective, well-established [legal] concepts,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Belya v. Kapral“be able to under the doctrine of ecclesiastical abstention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Belya v. Kapral
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.