¶1 Phillip Edward Bell appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying various pending motions as moot in this copyright infringement action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bell v. E. Davis Int’l Inc., No. CA-00-131-1-T (W.D.N.C. filed Feb. 14, 2002 & entered Feb. 15, 2002; Mar. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED.