Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 FRD 441 - United States v. Evans

United States v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
July 1991
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 1991

3 federal appellate ·

201968197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1703 · 18 U.S.C. § 1709

Relies on Sansone v. United States · Berra v. United States · Wenzler v. Pitchess · Public Service Commission v. United States · People v. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “delay is only relevant to those parcels which remain within the stream of commerce.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Whoever, being a Postal Service officer or employee, embezzles any letter, postal card, package, bag, or mail, or any article or thing contained therein entrusted to him or which comes into his possession intended to be conveyed by mail, or carried or delivered by any carrier, messenger, agent, or other person employed in any department of the Postal Service, or forwarded through or delivered from any Post Office or station thereof established by the authority of the Postmaster General or of the Postal Service; or steals, abstracts, or removes from any such letter, package, bag, or mail, any article or thing contained therein, shall be fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.