Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 45 IND 175 - Kintner v. State ex rel. Ripperdan

Kintner v. State ex rel. Ripperdan’s Empirical Analysis

1873

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2000

1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

5018731880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jeffersonville Railroad v. Swift · Carter v. Pomeroy · Whitman v. State ex rel. Hemminger · Swank v. Nichols' Administrator · Shank v. State ex rel. Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The question whether the witness was worthy of credit or not was a question for the jury, and the defendant was entitled to have that question go to them without the remarks from the court disparaging or destroying the force to be given to his testimony and showing that in the opinion of the court the witness had committed perjury. Had the court made use of the remarks in question in a formal instruction to the jury, no one could doubt, we think, as to its impropriety. We think it was equally improper for the court to make the remark when and in the manner made."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Irregularity in the proceedings of the court ... by which the party was prevented from having a fair trial,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Now it is for you to determine what the evidence shows in this case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.